President Trump gave reporters one of his most substantive Air Force One press gaggles of 2026 on June 5, touching on a blowout May jobs report, a brewing Republican standoff over his attorney general nominee, a sweeping new proposal to make ordinary Americans equity partners in AI companies, U.S. naval escorts keeping oil flowing through the Strait of Hormuz, the expected guilty plea of former National Security Adviser John Bolton, the controversial appointment of Bill Pulte as acting Director of National Intelligence, and plans for a new pedestrian promenade connecting the Lincoln Memorial to the Potomac River. The 19-minute session — held aboard Air Force One en route to Eau Claire, Wisconsin — ranged from global affairs to NBA Finals ticket prices, and offered an unfiltered window into the president’s thinking across nearly every major issue facing his administration. Assistance from Claude AI.
Participants
| Name | Title / Role |
|---|---|
| Donald J. Trump | 47th President of the United States |
| Unidentified reporters | White House traveling press pool (multiple; names not provided in transcript) |
Note: This post covers two related transcripts from the same travel day: a brief tarmac exchange upon landing in Wisconsin and the longer Air Force One press gaggle that preceded it.
1. The May Jobs Report: “Far Better Than Even Anticipated”
Trump opened both the Wisconsin arrival gaggle and the Air Force One session by celebrating the May 2026 employment report, released that morning by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
“So we had incredible job numbers today. You saw that. And we have good everything, good numbers. But the job numbers just came out and they were fantastic, far better than even anticipated.”
“It’s like nobody thought — many times what they thought they would be.”
Context for general readers: Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the “jobs report,” which tracks how many Americans were added to company payrolls (called nonfarm payrolls). Analysts and economists submit their best guesses beforehand — the “consensus forecast” — and the actual number is then compared to those predictions.
⚡ PARTIALLY ACCURATE — Jobs Report Claim: Trump’s description of the jobs report as “incredible” is well-supported. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls grew by 172,000 in May, substantially above the consensus forecast of approximately 80,000–88,000 — roughly double what economists had predicted (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026; Trading Economics, 2026). The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3 percent. However, Trump’s characterization of the result as “many times what they thought” overstates the gap. The actual number was approximately double the consensus estimate — impressive, but not multiples of it. Also notable: upward revisions to March and April added another 93,000 jobs to prior counts.
Trump also argued that the standard market reaction to strong economic data is perverse:
“Unfortunately, we’re in a world where for the last 15 years or so, when you have good numbers, the market goes down… And you don’t have to have inflation by having growth, and we have great growth. And that doesn’t mean inflation. In fact, it can be anti-inflation growth.”
This reflects a longstanding Trump argument — that the Federal Reserve and markets are too fixated on inflation risk and punish good economic news by expecting interest rate increases in response.
2. The Federal Reserve, Kevin Warsh, and the Interest Rate Debate
A reporter asked: “Given those job numbers, do you think the Fed should cut rates at its next meeting? And do you think new chair Kevin Warsh can convince the rest of —”
Trump redirected but made clear his position:
“Well, I’m going to let Kevin make that decision. I’d like to see lower interest rates, because each point, think of this, is $600 billion. OK?”
Context for general readers: The Federal Reserve sets the benchmark interest rate that ripples through the economy — affecting mortgage rates, car loans, business borrowing, and the cost of the federal government’s own debt. Kevin Warsh was sworn in as the new Federal Reserve Chair on May 22, 2026, replacing Jerome Powell. Warsh has long been associated with the view that rates should come down, but he now faces a Federal Open Market Committee that is, by many accounts, skeptical of cuts given persistent inflation (CNBC, 2026).
⚠️ MISLEADING — “$600 Billion Per Point” Claim: Trump repeated his claim that each one-percentage-point reduction in interest rates saves the government $600 billion. This significantly overstates the immediate savings. The U.S. carries approximately $36–37 trillion in federal debt, but most of it is in long-term, fixed-rate Treasury bonds that don’t reprice when rates change. The annual interest on federal debt was approximately $1.1–1.2 trillion in recent years. An immediate full-point cut would not produce $600 billion in annual savings, as only new debt issuance and floating-rate obligations would benefit in the near term (Congressional Budget Office, 2025). Adding to the confusion, Trump also said later in the same session that cutting one point saves “hundreds of millions of dollars” — which is off in the opposite direction by a factor of roughly 2,000 to 3,000.
When a reporter noted that financial markets were actually pricing in a potential rate hike — not a cut — at the October FOMC meeting, Trump deflected:
“I leave it up to Kevin. But I’ve always said, and I’ve said it for years, when you have a country that’s doing well, the market should go up.”
He also took a parting shot at his predecessor at the Fed:
“We had a Fed chair that didn’t understand that.”
⚡ PARTIALLY ACCURATE — Market Rate Hike Expectations: The reporter’s correction was accurate. As of early June 2026, markets reflected increasing expectations of a rate hike later in the year, not a cut, due to elevated inflation from the Iran conflict and surging oil prices (Schwab, 2026). Warsh’s first FOMC meeting was scheduled for June 16–17.
3. Bill Pulte as Acting DNI: The Intelligence Community’s Unusual New Overseer
A reporter asked who was under consideration to permanently lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the agency that coordinates all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies.
Trump disclosed he was conducting a search:
“I have five interviews. And we’ll have a very good person watching things, Bill Pulte, but I have five interviews.”
When asked whether Pulte would cut staff at ODNI:
“I wouldn’t mind. I’ve heard that’s way too high for way too long. Yeah, I wouldn’t mind. If he cut, I wouldn’t mind that.”
Context for general readers: Bill Pulte is primarily known as the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — the government-backed mortgage giants. Trump named Pulte as acting DNI on June 2, 2026, to replace Tulsi Gabbard, who announced her resignation effective June 30 after her husband was diagnosed with a rare form of bone cancer (CNBC, 2026; NPR, 2026). Pulte has no publicly known experience in national intelligence. Critically, he will simultaneously hold his housing role AND the acting DNI post, overseeing the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies while also managing federal mortgage policy.
The appointment drew bipartisan criticism. Senator Angus King, who was himself considered for the DNI role in 2020, said the appointment makes “no sense” by any objective measure of experience or expertise (CBS News, 2026). By law, Congress established in 2004 that any DNI nominee must have “extensive national security expertise.” Acting officials are not subject to confirmation but serve under the same statutory framework.
Pulte was confirmed by Trump to stay in his FHFA role simultaneously.
4. AI Companies and Making Americans “Partners in the Revolution”
This was perhaps the most policy-significant exchange of the gaggle.
A reporter asked: “Are you considering the possibility of the U.S. government taking stakes in some AI companies?”
Trump pointed to the Intel deal as his model:
“Well, it’s something — I did it with Intel. So I made a deal on Intel. I made for the country, $50 billion. We took a stake in Intel. It was given to us by our helping. I said, look, we’ll help you, but you have to give us 10 percent of the company. That was Intel just nine months ago.”
Context for general readers — The Intel Deal: In August 2025, the Trump administration converted approximately $8.9 billion in federal CHIPS Act grants and Defense Department funds that had already been awarded to Intel into a 9.9% equity stake in the company — making the U.S. government one of Intel’s largest shareholders. The deal was negotiated directly with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan (CNBC, 2025; CNN, 2025).
⚡ PARTIALLY ACCURATE — Intel “$50 Billion” Claim: The government’s original Intel investment was $8.9 billion — not zero, as Trump sometimes implies, since it was converted from previously awarded taxpayer-funded grants. As of approximately May 2026, after Intel’s stock surged following a major Apple chip manufacturing deal, the stake had grown to roughly $56.5 billion in market value, representing unrealized gains of approximately $47 billion (Yahoo Finance, 2026). Trump’s “$50 billion” figure approximates the unrealized gain, not the total value of the stake. Importantly, these are paper gains — the government has not sold shares and has no board seats or governance rights (Intel, 2025). Senator Elizabeth Warren and others have questioned whether this structure actually benefits taxpayers or simply converts grants into a passive, minority equity position with no influence over the company’s direction (Senate Banking Committee, 2025).
Trump then described a much broader idea — extending this model to the entire AI industry:
“There’s so much money and it’s so big that there are concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies. And I will tell you, yeah, I have. I have spoken with all of them.”
He announced a White House summit with the leading AI companies is planned for the following week:
“I actually have a meeting scheduled in a very near future with — all of the companies? And we’re talking about it, where the American people can benefit from the success of AI.”
When asked which companies, Trump confirmed: “All of them. All the big ones.” A follow-up listed Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX/Elon Musk. Trump: “All of them. They’re all coming to the White House probably next week.”
When a reporter noted that Senator Bernie Sanders had proposed something similar — a 50% public/private AI partnership — Trump pushed back on the framing but acknowledged common ground:
“No. No, actually… when Bernie Sanders was taken advantage of with Hillary Clinton… I got many of his people. They voted for me, because we are on an economic plan, as far as economics is concerned, we have certain things that aren’t that far apart.”
“I’ve been talking about it for the last year.”
This is a notable convergence: a Republican president and a democratic socialist senator advancing similar frameworks for public ownership of transformative technology — though differing significantly on the details and scale.
5. The Lincoln Memorial Promenade and the Kennedy Center Battle
Trump addressed his announcement from the day before — a proposed pedestrian promenade connecting the back of the Lincoln Memorial to the Potomac River:
“It’s always been — the Lincoln Memorial has always been very tied to the Potomac River, but they built two roadways behind it, unexpectedly, at the time, many years ago but after the memorial was built. It used to have a tide of the river and then the highways cut it off.”
“We have a really beautiful plan, where it goes over beautiful — a beautiful series of platforms that bring you right down to the river.”
Context for general readers: The promenade, which Trump’s team has floated calling the “Trump Promenade,” was announced June 4, 2026. The project would connect pedestrians from the back of the Lincoln Memorial, over two major roadways, to the riverfront below. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has said it fulfills the original McMillan Plan vision for the National Mall. No cost or timeline has been publicly disclosed (Washington Post, 2026; ABC News, 2026).
On funding, Trump was deliberately vague:
“We won’t have to go back to Congress or anything. We have a lot of sources of funding.”
He tied the project to the Kennedy Center battle, where a federal judge ruled that Trump cannot rename the performing arts center or control its operations without congressional authorization — blocking the Trump name from appearing on the building:
“He’s a totally conflicted judge, should be ashamed of himself. But they’ve asked me in the strongest of language to stay involved with the Kennedy Center.”
“We have to fix the Kennedy Center, both physically and from the standpoint of attendance… the building will — it’s very dangerous, number one. Number two, it was losing, for years, tremendous amounts of money.”
Trump confirmed he remains chairman of the Kennedy Center and said he is looking at the judge’s ruling. He described the performing arts center as a chronic money-loser, noting that venues like Carnegie Hall face similar struggles.
6. Oil, Iran, and the Strait of Hormuz
Context for general readers: The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil flows. Since a U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran escalated in early 2026, Iran has threatened to block or restrict shipping through the strait, causing major global oil price spikes. The U.S. Navy has been providing escorts for oil tankers attempting to transit the waterway.
A reporter asked whether Trump would limit U.S. gasoline exports if prices spike in the short term.
Trump was bullish on American energy resources and the naval escort mission:
“We have more oil and gas and coal and everything else than any other country on the planet. And then when you add Venezuela to it, we have probably 64 percent of that type of energy.”
“Venezuela is working out very well. We’re getting along incredibly. The country is happy. The people love the USA. And we have a lot of, the big oil companies are moving in there now, as we speak, and we’re going to be taking out millions of barrels of oil.”
On the naval escorts:
“A lot. I don’t want to say how many, but a lot. A lot of oil is coming into our country. A lot of oil is coming into the world that people don’t even know about, and that’s why it’s at $97 a barrel instead of $300 a barrel.”
He predicted prices would fall sharply once the Iran situation is resolved, pointing to a $1.85-per-gallon gasoline price he saw in Iowa about three-and-a-half months earlier.
⚠️ MISLEADING — Oil Price Claims: Trump cited oil at “$97 a barrel,” but as of June 5, 2026, WTI crude was trading closer to $91–93 per barrel after falling approximately 3% on Iran negotiation optimism; Brent crude was around $93–95 (Trading Economics, 2026). While Trump’s overall point — that naval escorts have helped prevent prices from reaching catastrophic levels — has merit given forecasts early in the conflict projected far higher prices, his specific price figures were slightly elevated. The $300/barrel prediction he attributes to “people” was a worst-case market scenario, not a consensus forecast.
🔍 UNVERIFIABLE — “64 Percent” Energy Claim: Trump’s assertion that the U.S. and Venezuela together control roughly 64% of the world’s relevant energy resources is not supported by publicly available data reviewed for this article. The U.S. holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves when unconventional resources are counted, but combining with Venezuela — which has the world’s largest conventional proven reserves — does not produce the 64% figure for global energy production or reserves by standard metrics.
On Iran’s nuclear program:
“We’re having great success with Iran. We — they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon, and they’re in no position to have a nuclear weapon.”
🔍 UNVERIFIABLE — Iran Nuclear Assessment: Trump’s confident assertion that Iran will not achieve nuclear weapons is a policy goal and intelligence assessment, not a verified fact. As of June 2026, the U.S. and Iran remain in active conflict, and Iran’s nuclear status is a matter of ongoing intelligence monitoring. No independent confirmation of this claim is available.
7. Thom Tillis vs. Todd Blanche: A Republican Senate Showdown
One of the most explosive exchanges involved Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who announced he would not vote to confirm Todd Blanche as Attorney General unless Blanche explicitly condemns the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.
Context for general readers: Todd Blanche is Trump’s former personal attorney and current acting Attorney General. Trump nominated him for the permanent AG role. Blanche needs confirmation from the full Senate, and the Senate Judiciary Committee — of which Tillis is a member — could block his nomination. Tillis, who is not seeking re-election in 2026, has become increasingly willing to break with Trump on certain issues. He is one of at least three Republican senators who have raised concerns about Blanche (CNN, 2026).
Trump’s response was scorched-earth:
“Senator Tillis is a loser. That’s why he didn’t run. He didn’t run because I wouldn’t support him, and he’s just an angry man because he’s not going to be a Senator any longer. He wasn’t respected in the Senate. He fought a lot of people. He fought Pete Hegseth. Pete Hegseth turned out to be a gem. No, Senator Tillis is a loser, stone-cold.”
“He’s an angry man because I basically — he was forced to leave the Senate because I wouldn’t support him, and he quit.”
“Todd Blanche is a brilliant guy, who everybody likes and everybody respects. And Tillis is always like, I’m going to do this, I’m going to do that.”
⚡ PARTIALLY ACCURATE — Tillis “Quit” Claim: Tillis did announce he would not seek re-election in 2026. Trump had previously stated he would not support Tillis in any re-election bid. However, Trump’s framing that Tillis “quit” because he “was forced to leave” overstates Trump’s role. Tillis had served two full Senate terms and, per reporting, had complex personal and political reasons for his decision (New Republic, 2026; Newsweek, 2026). Tillis has continued to act as an independent voice and is not simply retiring quietly.
8. John Bolton’s Expected Guilty Plea
A reporter raised the news that former National Security Adviser John Bolton is expected to plead guilty in a classified documents case.
Context for general readers: Bolton served as Trump’s National Security Adviser from 2018 to 2019 before a falling out. He later wrote a critical book about Trump and became a vocal opponent. He was indicted in October 2025 on 18 federal counts related to sharing classified material — specifically, diary entries covering his time in the White House — with his wife and daughter, neither of whom held security clearances. A change-of-plea hearing is scheduled for June 26, 2026, at which Bolton is expected to plead guilty to one count of retaining classified national defense information and pay a $2.25 million fine (CBS News, 2026; Washington Post, 2026).
Trump used the news to settle old scores:
“I was never much of a fan of John Bolton. I never thought he was a smart person. And he was a radical right in terms of war, not in terms of other things. He was — he wanted to go to war with anybody that opened their mouth, anybody that talked. And I used him for a purpose.”
“He’s a bad guy, John Bolton. He’s a dirty guy, and we caught him. And we caught him.”
⚡ PARTIALLY ACCURATE — Bolton Case Characterization: Bolton is indeed expected to plead guilty to a federal charge (CBS News, 2026). However, Trump’s framing that the administration “caught him” misrepresents the nature of the case. The classified material Bolton allegedly retained was shared only with his wife and daughter for possible use in a memoir — not with foreign governments, political adversaries, or the media (CNBC, 2026). Bolton has maintained that the prosecution is politically motivated retribution for his public criticism of Trump. The change-of-plea hearing has been scheduled but the plea has not yet been formally entered as of the date of this transcript.
9. Taiwan Arms Sale: $14 Billion Under Review
A reporter asked whether Trump had decided on a proposed $14 billion arms sale to Taiwan.
“We’re looking at that. Yeah. We’re looking at that.”
When asked if he still plans to speak with Taiwan’s president:
“I’ll always talk to him, but we’re looking at it.”
No additional details were provided on the status or timeline of the decision.
10. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: An IPO Still On the Table
With Bill Pulte now splitting time between the FHFA and the acting DNI role, a reporter asked whether a potential public stock offering (IPO) for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was now off the table.
Context for general readers: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-backed companies that guarantee or own trillions of dollars’ worth of American mortgages, making them central to the U.S. housing market. They have been in federal conservatorship since the 2008 financial crisis — essentially under government control. Privatizing them through a stock offering has been a long-discussed idea, but politically complex.
Trump said the IPO remains a possibility:
“No it’s not. We’re thinking about an IPO for that. It’s not a rush, but we’ve created a — I could have sold that for literally less than 10 percent in my first term. I was offered — a lot of people were offering me money to buy Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac… and I didn’t want to do it. Now, I think we would consider an IPO.”
On Pulte remaining at FHFA while also serving as acting DNI:
“He’s staying there.”
🔍 UNVERIFIABLE — “$1 Trillion Value” Claim: In a separate June 4 statement (not this transcript), Trump said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “probably have $1 trillion in value.” As of Q1 2026, Fannie Mae reported a net worth of $112.7 billion (SEC/Fannie Mae, 2026); Freddie Mac’s financials are comparable. The $1 trillion figure appears to be a speculative estimate of potential combined IPO valuation, not a figure grounded in current financials. Fannie and Freddie shares have actually fallen approximately 34–38% year-to-date in 2026 amid uncertainty over privatization timing (ZeroHedge, 2026).
11. MLB Salary Cap and the College Sports Crisis
In an unexpected detour, Trump weighed in on Major League Baseball’s push for a salary cap:
“If you don’t have a salary cap, you don’t have a sport, because they can’t help themselves. You know, in sports, they can’t help themselves. Football has a salary cap.”
“They should have done it a long time ago.”
He connected this to what he described as a broader crisis in college sports, driven by Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation rules that now allow college athletes to be paid by sponsors and schools:
Context for general readers: NIL rules, implemented starting in 2021, dramatically changed college athletics by allowing student-athletes to profit from their fame. Schools have since spent enormous sums on athlete compensation to compete for top recruits. Trump is working with former Yankees executive Randy Levine and legendary college football coach Nick Saban on what he described as a framework to impose some financial limits on college sports spending.
“I think what’s going to happen, if you don’t have what they’re trying to do now, that’s sort of a cap in a certain way. If you don’t have that, you really have a problem in not only college sports, colleges, where you see where Penn State lost $500 million, where a certain school that I like very much in Florida, they lose $400 million, $500 million.”
❌ FALSE — Penn State “$500 Million” Loss: Trump’s claim that Penn State “lost $500 million” from college sports NIL spending is not supported by available financial data. Penn State’s entire athletic department revenue is approximately $200 million annually — a $500 million loss would be catastrophically larger than the school’s total athletic budget. While NIL spending has strained some athletic programs, the figures Trump cited are far beyond what publicly reported university financial data shows.
12. Ukraine and Russia: “Getting Close” to Resolution
With Ukrainian President Zelenskyy having written a letter to Russian President Putin proposing a face-to-face meeting, a reporter asked whether Trump still wanted Russia and Ukraine to negotiate directly before the U.S. gets more involved.
Trump expressed guarded optimism:
“Well, I don’t mind. Let them deal. I’m the one that got them to this position and I think that’s going to get worked out. I think we’re getting close to where Russia, Ukraine — should have — it’s a war that should have never happened, would have never happened if I was president.”
On who would lead the U.S. negotiating effort:
“He’ll be involved, I’ll be involved, JD, everybody. We’ll all be involved. We want to see it done.”
He referenced Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, and implicitly Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff as the U.S. team involved in diplomacy.
Trump drew a contrast with the Biden administration’s approach:
“They’re buying things from us, actually, at full price. With Biden, he gave them everything. He just gave them hundreds of millions of dollars of weapons and everything else.”
He closed on a sobering note about the human cost of the conflict:
“Over the course of the month, 25,000 people were killed, Russia, Ukraine, 25,000. It’s not acceptable, not acceptable.”
🔍 UNVERIFIABLE — “25,000 Killed Per Month” Claim: The figure of 25,000 combined Russian and Ukrainian casualties per month could not be independently verified for this article. Published estimates of Ukraine war casualties have varied widely and are contested by all parties. This figure, if accurate, would represent a very significant escalation in casualty rates compared to prior reporting periods.
13. NBA Finals, Wembanyama, and Ticket Prices
In a lighter moment, a reporter asked Trump about Game 1 of the NBA Finals, which featured the New York Knicks:
“I did. Well, we’re going to game three, I guess it’s game three, on Monday. I thought it was amazing. I think the Knicks have an amazing team, the way they played. It started off slow and it just got stronger and stronger. Wemby [Victor Wembanyama] looks like he’s going to be a great player, but they really played well, I thought.”
Asked his favorite Knicks: “Brunson is fantastic. Towns is fantastic. They just have a great team.”
A reporter raised a pointed question about economic access: “The cheapest price for Game 3 is $8,000. Everyday Americans can’t afford these sporting events.”
Trump was unapologetic:
“They can watch it on television. It’s sort of semi-free to watch on television, but that’s the way life goes. You have some and — now, if the team wasn’t a big success, you could go very easily. So, you know, that’s the way life is.”
A reporter then noted that Wembanyama — who plays for the San Antonio Spurs and is French — had crossed his arms during the U.S. national anthem. Trump said he had not seen it: “I did not see that. Is that what he did?… Well, I guess you have to ask him.”
14. White House Arrival Remarks: Wisconsin and Iran
On the brief tarmac exchange upon landing in Wisconsin, Trump reinforced his economic messaging:
“We have factories and plants being built all over our country at a number that we’ve never had before — ever — in our history.”
He also offered a confident but brief update on the Iran situation:
“The situation with Iran seems to be going quite well.”
A reporter’s follow-up question about when he last had discussions on Iran was cut off in the transcript.
Social Media Post
🚨 Trump’s Air Force One press gaggle was packed with news: a blowout May jobs report (172K jobs vs. ~80K forecast), a plan to bring every major AI company to the White House next week to discuss making Americans equity partners in the industry, and confirmation that the U.S. Navy is escorting “a lot” of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. He also called Senator Tillis a “stone-cold loser” for blocking his AG nominee, reacted to John Bolton’s expected guilty plea, and unveiled fresh details on a new promenade connecting the Lincoln Memorial to the Potomac River. Full breakdown at the link.
MLA Citation
Trump, Donald J. “Press Gaggle: Donald Trump Speaks to Reporters On Board Air Force One.” Factbase / Roll Call / FiscalNote, 5 June 2026, factba.se. Accessed 5 June 2026.
Trump, Donald J. “Remarks: Donald Trump Speaks to Reporters After Air Force One Arrival.” Factbase / Roll Call / FiscalNote, 5 June 2026, factba.se. Accessed 5 June 2026.
Sources Referenced in Fact-Checks
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026, June 5). The employment situation — May 2026 (USDL-26-0786). https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
CBS News. (2026, June 4). John Bolton plans to plead guilty in classified documents case. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-bolton-guilty-plea-classified-documents-case-source/
CBS News. (2026, June 3). Trump names controversial housing official Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bill-pulte-acting-director-national-intelligence-trump/
CNBC. (2025, August 22). U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/22/intel-goverment-equity-stake.html
CNBC. (2026, June 4). John Bolton agrees to plead guilty to retaining classified information. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/04/bolton-guilty-plea-trump-national-security-advisor.html
CNBC. (2026, May 22). Trump swears Kevin Warsh in as Fed chair, seeking interest rate cuts. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/22/trump-kevin-warsh-fed-chair-interest-rates.html
CNN. (2025, August 22). The US takes a 10% stake in Intel as part of Trump’s big tech push. https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/22/tech/trump-intel-10-percent-stake
CNN. (2026, June 4). Thune: ‘Hard to say’ whether Blanche can win confirmation as attorney general. https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/04/politics/todd-blanche-confirmation-gop-senators
Intel Corporation. (2025, August 22). Intel and Trump Administration reach historic agreement to accelerate American technology and manufacturing leadership [Press release]. https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1748
Newsweek. (2026, June 5). Trump rips “loser” Republican senator drawing red line on Blanche confirmation. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-rips-loser-gop-senator-drawing-red-line-on-blanche-confirmation-12038808
NPR. (2026, June 2). Trump appoints Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence. https://www.npr.org/2026/06/02/nx-s1-5844221/trump-appoints-housing-official-as-acting-director-of-national-intelligence
Schwab, Charles. (2026, June 5). Warsh at the reins: New Fed chair faces challenges. https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/are-you-there-inflation-its-me-kevin-warsh
Senate Banking Committee. (2025, September 4). Warren presses Commerce Secretary on Trump’s deal to give the U.S. 10% stake in Intel. https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/minority/warren-presses-commerce-secretary-on-trumps-deal-to-give-the-us-10-stake-in-intel
Trading Economics. (2026, June 5). United States non-farm payrolls. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/non-farm-payrolls
Trading Economics. (2026, June 5). Crude oil price. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil
Washington Post. (2026, June 4). John Bolton expected to plead guilty in classified-documents case. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/06/04/john-bolton-expected-plead-guilty-classified-documents-case/
Washington Post. (2026, June 5). Trump says he will build ‘promenade’ between Lincoln Memorial and Potomac. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/05/trump-says-he-will-build-promenade-between-lincoln-memorial-potomac/
Yahoo Finance. (2026, May). Trump’s 10% Intel (INTC) stake gains $47 billion after Apple chip deal. https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/trump-10-intel-intc-stake-175705778.html