On November 14, 2025, President Donald J. Trump answered questions about a recent medical examination that included an MRI. A transcript of the exchange is at the end of this article. The exchange raises several red-flag considerations – not a diagnosis, but signals that warrant closer scrutiny because they differ from normal medical practice, normal patient understanding of MRI procedures, and normal patterns of executive-function communication. Assistance from ChatGPT AI.

1. Implausible Claim: “I have no idea what they analyzed.”

Patients must be told which body part is being scanned to provide informed consent. MRI orders are body-region specific (e.g., “MRI brain with contrast,” “MRI lumbar spine”). There is no such thing as a generic “MRI” without region specification (American College of Radiology, 2023).

A patient claiming they “have no idea” what body part was examined could indicate:

1. Evasion, which is political rather than medical.
2. Cognitive slippage, meaning difficulty tracking or recalling a recent medical encounter.
3. Embarrassment-driven minimization, often present when the test was for something stigmatized (neurological symptoms).

Clinically, the failure or refusal to identify which body region was imaged—especially when specifically asked—would normally prompt follow-up evaluation.

2. Misrepresentation of MRI as “part of my standard yearly physical.”

This is factually incorrect. MRI is never a routine component of annual physicals, for any patient population, including presidents. MRI is only obtained when:

• There is a concerning symptom
• There is a known chronic condition requiring monitoring
• There is high-risk screening (very rare)

Misdescribing MRI as routine can indicate:

• Poor recall of his medical care
• Lack of comprehension of why the test was ordered
• Strategic deflection
• Reduced ability to distinguish normal vs. abnormal medical procedures, which in neurology can indicate anosognosia (impaired awareness of illness), common in several neurocognitive disorders (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 2024)

3. Exaggerated Superlatives (“best result he has ever seen”)

MRI reports are technical and describe findings, not subjective praise. No radiologist tells a patient that their MRI is “the best I have ever seen.”

Exaggerated superlatives are a known compensatory communication pattern in individuals experiencing:

• Anxiety about declining health
• Fragile self-presentation
• Cognitive changes that impair nuance, leading to broad, absolutist descriptions

The pattern is consistent with his long-term rhetorical style, but can be more pronounced in individuals experiencing cognitive decline (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011).

4. Inability to describe the cognitive test except in terms of perfection and self-comparison

His pivot from describing the MRI to recounting:

• “I aced it.”
• “I got a perfect score.”
• “The highest one.”

…is striking. When asked about medical imaging, he shifted immediately to self-evaluative performance metrics and comparisons to opponents. This is not typical medical communication and can reflect:

• Perseveration (the inability to shift topics easily), which can be a sign of frontal-executive dysfunction.
• Self-referential fixation, common in anxiety or cognitive rigidity.
• Defensive conflation of unrelated medical procedures.

Perseveration is not proof of decline but is viewed clinically as a soft neurological sign.

5. Conflation of frequency and purpose (“yearly,” “every two years,” “I think they do it every two years”)

Confusion about medical timelines is a mild but meaningful indicator. Patients typically remember whether a major imaging study is annual, biennial, or one-off. MRI is unusual, expensive, and often uncomfortable; people tend to remember why and when they had it.

Difficulty remembering basic temporal structure of medical events is often an early pattern in:

• Mild cognitive impairment
• Executive dysfunction
• Anxiety masking recall
• Poor doctor–patient communication

Again, not diagnostic—but clinically notable.

6. Refusal or inability to connect MRI to symptoms

In normal practice, an MRI is ordered because of:

• Headaches
• Balance issues
• Memory changes
• Vision problems
• Weakness
• Seizures
• Trauma

A patient unable or unwilling to identify any symptom related to an MRI is unusual. In cognitive neurology, patients with early decline often:

• Under-report symptoms
• Forget the precipitating issue
• Use global assurances (“doctors said it was perfect”) instead of specifics

This pattern—substituting global superlatives for details—is common in early executive-function decline (American Academy of Neurology, 2024).

---

Overall Assessment

Does the exchange contain medical or cognitive red flags? Yes—several.

While none are diagnostic in isolation, the combination is notable:

• Implausible lack of awareness of the tested body region
• Mischaracterization of MRI as routine
• Confusion about timing
• Exaggerated superlatives instead of medical facts
• Evasive or cognitively disorganized responses to direct medical questions
• Topic-shifting toward self-evaluating cognitive testing

Taken together, the exchange suggests one of the following:

1. He underwent an MRI for a neurological symptom and is minimizing or concealing it.
2. He genuinely does not recall the clinical context, which is itself a cognitive concern.
3. He is employing defensive rhetorical habits, which obscure whether a medical issue exists.
4. There may be early executive-function impairments, hinted at by the disorganization, self-referential redirection, and inability to recount simple details of care.

None of these conclusions require speculation about diagnosis; they follow directly from the mismatch between his statements and standard medical practice.

---

References

American Academy of Neurology. (2024). Guidelines for evaluation of cognitive complaints. Minneapolis, MN.

American College of Radiology. (2023). ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Imaging guidelines. Reston, VA.

Gorno-Tempini, M. L., et al. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76(11), 1006–1014.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. (2024). Clinical signs of neurological impairment. Bethesda, MD.

Transcript

Question: Mr. President, could you tell us why you needed to get an MRI? I, I understand that the results were good, but what was it for?

Donald Trump: Because it’s part of my physical. Getting an MRI is very standard. Well, you think I shouldn’t have it? Other people got it.

Question: [Inaudible] specific part of your body.

Donald Trump:I had an MRI. Here’s what you s- — serious. I had an MRI. The doctor said it was the best result he has ever seen as a doctor. That’s it. But I had an MRI as part of my standard yearly or every w- — I think they do it every two years, but I have the physical every year. And the result was outstanding.

Question: Is it your brain or —

Donald Trump: Uh, I have no idea what they analyzed, but whatever they analyzed, they analyzed it well. And they said that I had as good a result as they’ve ever seen. Now the other thing I took is I took as you know, a, uh, advanced, very advanced test on mental acuity. Because I think a president should have to do that. And as you probably heard, I aced it. I got a perfect score. I got the highest one, I got a perfect score. And the only reason I tell you that is it’s one subject, unlike Biden and others, that you can take off your plan.