Republican Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on June 28, 2026, in a wide-ranging interview that produced some of the week’s most revealing political moments: he contradicted his own party’s White House on the state of the Iran war, defended President Trump’s decision to hold a landmark bipartisan housing bill hostage to a voter ID measure that has already failed in the Senate, repeated a wage claim that was immediately corrected on-air by current federal data, and declined — with notable wiggle room — to rule out joining the Trump administration. The interview, conducted by NBC Chief Capitol Hill Correspondent Ryan Nobles, covered the Iran conflict, housing affordability, election integrity legislation, a dramatic shouting match between Trump and Republican senators, and the legal landmine surrounding Marshall’s own Kansas Senate seat. Assistance from Claude AI.
Participants
| Name | Title / Role |
|---|---|
| Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) | United States Senator, Kansas; Republican; seeking reelection in 2026 midterms |
| Ryan Nobles | Chief Capitol Hill Correspondent, NBC News; conducted the interview |
| Kristen Welker | Host, Meet the Press, NBC News (listed as host in transcript; Nobles conducted interview) |
Source
“Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) Is Interviewed on Meet the Press.” SEC/Financial Markets Regulatory Transcript Wire, 28 June 2026. ProQuest U.S. Newsstream Collection, ProQuest document ID 3357798622.
Topic-by-Topic Breakdown
1. The Iran War: Is It “Over”?
Background for general readers: The United States and Israel launched coordinated military strikes on Iran on February 28, 2026, beginning what the U.S. code-named “Operation Epic Fury.” The conflict — which killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, devastated Iran’s navy, struck nuclear facilities, and triggered Iranian retaliatory missile barrages across the Middle East — shocked global markets and sent oil prices soaring. After more than five weeks of intense fighting, a ceasefire was reached on April 7–8, 2026. On June 17, 2026, President Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a framework agreement called the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), establishing a 60-day window for further negotiations. But overnight before this interview aired, the U.S. launched new strikes inside Iran — a fact that set up the interview’s first, most pointed exchange.
Nobles opened by noting the conflict had now passed 120 days and asked how the Trump administration could credibly call the war “over” if bombs were still falling.
Marshall initially avoided the question, defaulting to a three-part rhetorical frame he returned to throughout the interview: “no nukes for Iran, no forever wars, bring the cost of gas and grocery down.” He called ongoing strikes “almost just a mop-up operation” and pivoted to praising Secretary of State Marco Rubio for diplomatic work in Lebanon and Israel. He urged Americans to “root for the Trump team for once rather than try to tear them down.”
When Nobles pressed the direct question — is the war still going on? — Marshall gave an answer that contradicted his own administration’s messaging:
“Well, I don’t think the war is over. I think there is a detente going on right now…”
He described the situation as “a ceasefire” that Iran had broken, necessitating American responses. He said the U.S. had “destroyed their economy” and “destroyed their military.”
✅ ACCURATE — War duration: The 120-day claim is accurate. The conflict began February 28, 2026; June 28, 2026 is exactly 120 days later (Bureau of Conflict Analysis, 2026; Britannica, 2026).
⚠️ MISLEADING — “The major war is over”: Marshall’s characterization is partly misleading. While the Islamabad Memorandum was signed June 17, 2026, creating a ceasefire framework, overnight strikes as recently as the night before this interview demonstrate active military operations continue. The MoU explicitly requires a “permanent termination of military operations,” but implementation remains contested, particularly with Israel’s ongoing operations in Lebanon that Iran disputes (NPR, 2026; Al Jazeera, 2026).
⚠️ MISLEADING — “We destroyed their economy. We destroyed their military.” Iran’s military suffered significant damage — the U.S. reportedly destroyed at least 17–19 Iranian ships (including Iran’s only operational submarine), degraded Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities by approximately 90% according to CENTCOM, and struck nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. However, Iran continued to fire missiles throughout the 120-day conflict and retained operational military capacity throughout (Wikipedia: 2026 Iran war, 2026; CENTCOM, 2026). “Destroyed” overstates the damage.
2. Iran’s Nuclear Commitment: A Historic First — Or Not?
Marshall offered what he framed as a landmark diplomatic achievement:
“President Trump for the first time ever got Iran to sign a document that they will not develop any nuclear weapons in the future. That’s great.”
He added that Iran is also set to sign a U.N. Security Council resolution on the same commitment, and that “we’re making great progress.”
⚠️ MISLEADING — “For the first time ever”: The U.S. State Department explicitly told Congress that the JCPOA “is not a treaty or an executive agreement, and is not a signed document”; legal scholars have similarly described it as a “nonbinding, unsigned political” agreement (Wikipedia: Iran nuclear deal, 2026). Iran’s parliament endorsed the deal and Iran implemented its provisions, but no party signed it in the traditional sense.
There is one narrow dimension of significance to the 2026 Islamabad MoU: it genuinely is a signed document, with both Trump and Iranian President Pezeshkian signing it individually. But that does not rescue the “for the first time ever” claim, for a more foundational reason: Iran has been a formal signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) since signing in 1968 and ratifying in 1970 — a legally binding, ratified commitment explicitly prohibiting non-nuclear-weapon states from developing or acquiring nuclear weapons that has been on the books for over 55 years (Council on Foreign Relations, 2026). Additionally, the JCPOA’s text, even as an unsigned political agreement, included Iran’s commitment that it would not seek nuclear weapons, and was endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231 (NPR, 2026; Al Jazeera, 2026). The word “reaffirms” in the 2026 MoU’s nuclear clause is the tell: the document itself acknowledges this is not a new obligation. President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the JCPOA in 2018.
What is genuinely new about the 2026 MoU: it was reached after a 120-day war that inflicted serious damage on Iran, and it includes a mechanism for Iran to dilute (or “downblend”) its stockpile of highly-enriched uranium under IAEA supervision — a more concrete operational commitment than existed in 2015. However, as NPR noted, the MoU was negotiated bilaterally and leaves key issues — including final terms on Iran’s enrichment levels and ballistic missile program — for future negotiations within a 60-day window (NPR, 2026; Islamabad Memorandum Wikipedia, 2026).
ℹ️ NOTE — Senator Bill Cassidy’s assessment: Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), who was in the room for the shouting match Marshall referenced (see Section 5 below), publicly called the Iran deal “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades,” saying it allows Iran to rebuild infrastructure and has taught Iran that “threatening the Strait of Hormuz works” (CNBC, 2026).
3. The Housing Bill: Trump’s Hostage Gambit
Background for general readers: The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act was a rare and sweeping piece of bipartisan legislation aimed at easing the U.S. housing crisis — cutting red tape to increase home construction, limiting large institutional investors’ ability to purchase single-family homes, and expanding housing supply. It passed the Senate 85–5 and the House 358–32 earlier in the same week as this interview. That’s an almost unheard-of level of bipartisan agreement. The night before the scheduled signing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt celebrated it on social media as “one of the most significant pieces of housing affordability legislation in American history” and declared “promises made, promises kept.” Within hours, Trump canceled the signing entirely (Newsweek, 2026; CBS News, 2026).
Nobles played Leavitt’s quote directly and asked Marshall: “Did President Trump break his promise when it comes to housing and affordability?”
Marshall did not directly answer whether Trump broke a promise. Instead, he: (1) pivoted to criticizing Biden-era cost increases; (2) described the housing bill as “part of the puzzle”; and (3) defended Trump’s refusal to sign it as “classic Donald Trump negotiation style.”
“He’s going to grab every leverage point he can. And this is one to get the bigger priority to cross the finish line. And that’s election integrity.”
Trump had announced he would not sign the housing bill until Congress passed the SAVE America Act — the voter ID and proof-of-citizenship legislation (see Section 4). Marshall argued both things could happen: “We can have both.”
✅ ACCURATE — Vote margins: The bill passed 85–5 in the Senate and 358–32 in the House, as Nobles reported. These supermajority margins mean the bill is veto-proof — Congress could override a Trump veto if it chose to (Yahoo Finance/Moneywise, 2026).
✅ ACCURATE — Leavitt’s statement: Leavitt did describe the bill as Nobles stated, and Trump did cancel the signing and call it “of minor importance” — a jarring reversal from his own press secretary’s characterization hours earlier (Newsweek, 2026; Time, 2026).
ℹ️ CONTEXT — Trump’s leverage: Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said he’d be “sad” if Trump vetoed the bill. Even retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) called the maneuver an inexplicable “hostage” situation (Boston Globe, 2026; CBS News, 2026). The bill had strong Republican support and was seen as a key affordability win heading into the midterms.
4. Wages and Inflation: A Live, On-Air Correction
This was the interview’s sharpest factual exchange. Marshall made a broad claim about economic progress:
“Real wages are outpacing inflation right now.”
Nobles immediately pushed back: “We should point out that at this point, wages are not outpacing inflation. That’s not correct.”
Marshall partially retreated but maintained: “I think real wages are up since President Trump became president. We do have a little blip going on right now, but as the gasoline prices come down, inflation is going to come down, and wages will get back up.”
❌ FALSE — “Real wages are outpacing inflation right now”: This claim is contradicted by federal data. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Real Earnings Summary for May 2026, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.8% year-over-year. Separately, nominal wages grew 3.7% while the Consumer Price Index rose 4.2% over the same 12-month period — meaning workers are losing 0.5 percentage points of purchasing power per year (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026; USAFacts, 2026). Inflation has outpaced wage growth in every month since April 2026 (USAFacts, 2026).
⚠️ MISLEADING — “Real wages are up since President Trump became president”: This claim is more defensible as a longer-range assertion. Brookings Institution analysis shows that most real pay measures have grown since Q1 2024, and real wages did outpace inflation through much of 2025 (Brookings, 2026). However, Q1 2026 data shows “most real pay measures declined” — the first such declines since 2022 (Brookings, 2026). Calling the current negative trend a “little blip” glosses over a real and measurable reversal.
⚠️ MISLEADING — “The cost of housing, healthcare, childcare all go up 50 percent” (under Biden): Marshall made this claim while pivoting to attack his predecessors’ record. Overall cumulative inflation during the Biden administration (January 2021 – January 2025) was approximately 20–21%. While childcare and housing costs have risen sharply and represent genuine hardship for millions of families, the “50 percent” figure for all three categories simultaneously is not supported by available government data (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026; U.S. Census, 2025). The Child Care Aware of America organization found average center-based day care costs around $11,582 nationally in 2023 — a significant expense, but not a 50% increase across all categories.
5. The SAVE America Act: Voter ID, Election Fraud, and an Uncomfortable Question
Background for general readers: The SAVE America Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship — such as a passport or birth certificate — at the time of voter registration for federal elections. It would also require photo ID at the polls. It passed the House 218–213 in February 2026 but has not cleared the Senate. To overcome a filibuster, supporters need 60 votes; Republicans hold 53 seats and have not come close to winning seven Democratic votes. As of June 2026, the Senate officially failed to pass the bill as an amendment to a DHS funding measure, with four Republicans joining Democrats to block it (Wikipedia: SAVE Act, 2026).
Trump has made passing this bill a condition for signing other legislation — including the housing bill discussed above.
Nobles played a clip of Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) questioning whether the infrastructure to implement SAVE could even be built in time for the 2026 midterm elections:
“Does any rational person who’s ever had any experience with implementing election law really think that it’s possible to have all that in place in time for this election and not be disruptive?”
Marshall’s response acknowledged Tillis might be right, but invoked the “don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good” argument: “When are we going to do this?”
He described election integrity as foundational: “I don’t think that fraud will ever end our democracy, but I’m worried about is those that had this belief, this fear that fraud is indeed possible and then it could go unpunished.”
When Nobles challenged him directly — “Federal law already prohibits noncitizens from voting. There’s no evidence that fraudulent votes have changed any election outcomes. Are you trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist?” — Marshall did not dispute the facts. Instead, he argued from perception: “The perception here is reality, Ryan. People want election integrity.”
He claimed “90 percent of Americans want voter ID” and argued that noncitizen voting is analogous to flying without a license: you don’t wait for a crash before requiring credentials.
✅ ACCURATE — Tillis’ skepticism: The SAVE Act has now officially failed in the Senate. Tillis’ prediction that there was not enough time or money to implement it before the election has been borne out by events (Wikipedia: SAVE Act, 2026; FactCheck.org, 2026).
✅ ACCURATE (Nobles) — Federal law already prohibits noncitizen voting: The National Voter Registration Act and Help America Vote Act prohibit noncitizens from registering or voting in federal elections. This is correct (FactCheck.org, 2026; Vote.org, 2026).
✅ ACCURATE (Nobles) — No evidence fraud changed election outcomes: This is a well-documented finding across multiple nonpartisan reviews. Utah completed one of the most comprehensive citizenship reviews in U.S. history — examining over 2 million registered voters — and found one confirmed instance of noncitizen registration and zero instances of noncitizen voting (Bipartisan Policy Center, 2026; Vote.org, 2026).
ℹ️ CONTEXT — Nobles’ Heritage Foundation reference: Nobles stated the Heritage Foundation “pointed out that there’s only 100 total instances of noncitizens voting” going back to the 1980s. The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database does document a small number of noncitizen voting cases — the specific figure of 100 is a reasonable characterization of the limited documented scope — though Marshall did not contest this figure (FactCheck.org, 2026).
⚠️ MISLEADING — “90 percent of Americans want voter ID”: The polling figure is real but overstated. Multiple major polls consistently show approximately 80–84% support for requiring photo ID to vote, not 90%: Pew Research Center (August 2025) found 83% support; Gallup (October 2024) found 84%; Harvard CAPS/Harris found 81% (Wisconsin Watch, 2026; Newsweek, 2026). Marshall inflated the figure by roughly 6–9 percentage points.
ℹ️ IMPORTANT CONTEXT — What the polls actually measure: Polling scholars note that broad support for “voter ID” in the abstract does not necessarily translate to support for the SAVE Act’s more stringent requirements. The SAVE Act’s proof-of-citizenship requirement — beyond simple photo ID — is more controversial. According to the Brennan Center for Justice and University of Maryland research, approximately 21.3 million Americans of voting age do not have easy access to citizenship documents such as passports or birth certificates (FactCheck.org, 2026; Bipartisan Policy Center, 2026). Kansas’ own experience with a similar law found it prevented roughly 31,000 eligible citizens — 12% of all applicants — from registering to vote (Bipartisan Policy Center, 2026).
Notable exchange — Marshall’s deflection: When Nobles asked Marshall to name “one example of where there was some level of fraud that the SAVE America Act would have prevented that would have altered an election,” Marshall did not provide one. He pivoted to asking why Democrats are “afraid” of voter ID and used the airplane pilot licensing analogy.
6. The Capitol Hill Shouting Match: What Actually Happened
Background for general readers: On June 24, 2026 — four days before this interview — President Trump attended a private lunch with Republican senators on Capitol Hill. What followed was anything but a quiet legislative strategy session. The meeting quickly became a shouting match.
What happened: The previous day, the Senate had passed a War Powers Resolution directing Trump to remove U.S. forces from Iran — a symbolic but notable rebuke. Four Republicans voted with Democrats: Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and one other. Trump confronted senators about those votes. When he asked why anyone would vote for the War Powers resolution, Cassidy stood up and said: “You have not told the American people what’s going on. It was supposed to last four weeks. It’s lasted four months. Our original objectives have not been achieved, and I want to know what’s going on.” Trump reportedly called Cassidy a “lunatic.” Cassidy later admitted he “lost his temper” and matched the president’s “tone and volume.” Multiple sources described it as a shouting match; Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said Trump was “mad as a murder hornet” (ABC News, 2026; Axios, 2026; CBS News, 2026).
After the meeting, Cassidy was invited to a White House briefing with Vice President Vance and envoy Steve Witkoff. Following that briefing, Cassidy changed his vote and helped block a second, slightly different war powers resolution later the same evening (New Republic, 2026; ABC News, 2026).
Marshall’s take: He was in the room and offered a notably measured description: “I’m just shocked that there’s a world out there that thinks that grown people can’t have a firm discussion.” He compared it to hospital board meetings where doctors yell at each other. He said Trump “got a couple people to flip and vote in favor of him.”
Marshall explained Trump’s anger: the president felt that while he was negotiating the Iran deal, the War Powers vote made it look like his own team was undermining his negotiating leverage. Marshall described Trump as feeling “his legs cut out from under him.”
✅ ACCURATE — Marshall’s description of the meeting: Multiple independent news sources confirm the shouting match occurred on June 24, that it centered on the Iran War Powers resolution, and that two senators (Cassidy and Paul) changed or moderated their votes afterward (ABC News, 2026; CBS News, 2026; Axios, 2026).
ℹ️ NOTABLE OMISSION: Marshall’s otherwise accurate description of the meeting left out that Trump called Cassidy a “lunatic,” that Trump also highlighted Cassidy’s primary loss (Trump had endorsed Cassidy’s opponent), and that Cassidy described calling the war a “blunder” to the president’s face — a considerably sharper confrontation than Marshall’s hospital-board analogy suggests.
7. Marshall’s Political Future: Cabinet Denials and the Kansas Vacancy Problem
The interview’s closing segment touched directly on Marshall’s own political future — and contained arguably its most consequential moment.
Nobles raised rumors that Marshall was being considered for a Trump cabinet position — potentially HHS Secretary, given Marshall’s medical background. He asked directly: “Are you interested in serving in the Trump administration, and would you say yes if asked?”
Marshall denied it categorically: “There’s no truth to that at all. I have no interest in doing that. No one from the Trump administration has approached me over anything like that.”
He went on to say he is “right where God has put me” and cited his background as a physician, a fifth-generation farm kid, and a military veteran as uniquely qualifying him for his Senate role. He specifically mentioned working with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz (the Trump-appointed head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) on healthcare initiatives.
Then Nobles raised the Kansas vacancy law — and Marshall’s denial got more complicated.
Background on Kansas SB 105: In March 2025, the Kansas Republican-controlled legislature passed Senate Bill 105, which changed how Senate vacancies are filled. If a vacancy occurs after May 1 in an even-numbered year (like 2026), the replacement would be chosen by Republican legislative leaders, presented to Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly as a list of three names, and — under the state law — that appointed replacement would not face voters until 2028 (Kansas Reflector, 2026; Democracy Docket, 2026). The law’s architect, state Sen. Mike Thompson (R-Shawnee), has publicly acknowledged that speculation about Marshall potentially joining the Trump administration partly motivated the legislation (Kansas City Star via Kansas Reflector, 2026). Critics, including Gov. Kelly, have called the arrangement a scheme to effectively cancel the 2026 Senate election.
Nobles’ question: “If you were to resign before October 2nd, a Republican replacement would be appointed through 2028. That would take the power of picking your replacement out of the hands of voters. Can you tell us today that you’re committed to staying on the ballot through Election Day?”
Marshall: “I will be on the ballot on Election Day and will be honored to represent the people of Kansas for the next six years going forward.”
Nobles followed up: “So that means you’re ruling out any sort of an appointment in the Trump administration just to button it up?”
Marshall’s answer narrowed noticeably from his opening denial:
“I am ruling out any appointment in the Trump administration at least — at least through the next two or two or three years.”
Then: “Who knows what would happen four years from now.”
✅ ACCURATE — The Kansas vacancy law: The law exists as Nobles described. Under Kansas SB 105, a vacancy created after May 1 in an even-numbered year would result in the seat being filled at the election “two years following the year in which such vacancy occurs” — meaning the replacement would not face voters until 2028 (Kansas SB 105 Analysis, WichitaLiberty.org, 2026; Kansas Reflector, 2026; Democracy Docket, 2026).
ℹ️ NOTABLE HEDGE: Marshall’s final answer was materially different from his opening denial. He began by saying “there’s no truth to that at all” and “I have no interest in doing that.” He ended the interview by ruling out a cabinet appointment “at least through the next two or two or three years” — leaving open the possibility of a future appointment within the current presidential term, which runs through January 2029.
APA References
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026, June 10). Real earnings — May 2026. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/realer.nr0.htm
Bipartisan Policy Center. (2026, April 7). Five things to know about the SAVE America Act. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/five-things-to-know-about-the-save-act/
Britannica. (2026). 2026 Iran war. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/2026-Iran-war
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026, June). Consumer price index — May 2026. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
Brookings Institution. (2026, April 30). Has pay kept up with inflation? https://www.brookings.edu/articles/has-pay-kept-up-with-inflation/
CBS News. (2026, June 24). Trump cancels bipartisan housing bill signing, reiterates demand for SAVE America Act. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-signs-housing-bill-capitol/
CBS News. (2026, June 24). Trump has testy meeting with GOP senators, telling Cassidy at one point to sit down. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-testy-gop-senators-meeting-bill-cassidy/
Council on Foreign Relations. (2026). What is the Iran nuclear deal? https://www.cfr.org/backgrounders/what-iran-nuclear-deal
Democracy Docket. (2026). Kansas GOP scheme could cancel election in bid to weaken voters’ power to elect U.S. senators. https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/kansas-gop-scheme-could-cancel-election-in-bid-to-weaken-voters-power/
FactCheck.org. (2026, March 20). Q&A on the SAVE America Act. https://www.factcheck.org/2026/03/qa-on-the-save-america-act/
Kansas Reflector. (2026, June 17). Kansas Republicans could try to delay election for U.S. Senate if Roger Marshall leaves office. https://kansasreflector.com/2026/06/17/kansas-republicans-could-try-to-delay-election-for-u-s-senate-if-roger-marshall-leaves-office/
Newsweek. (2026, June 24). Trump halts bipartisan housing bill signing to demand votes on SAVE Act. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-threat-housing-bill-save-america-act-cancels-signing-12114934
NPR. (2026, June 18). Read the full text of Trump’s preliminary U.S.-Iran agreement to end the war. https://www.npr.org/2026/06/18/nx-s1-5863027/us-iran-trump-memorandum-of-understanding-full-text
NPR. (2026, June 19). What you need to know about the preliminary U.S.-Iran agreement signed by Trump. https://www.npr.org/2026/06/19/nx-s1-5863544/trump-us-iran-agreement
Al Jazeera. (2026, June 18). What the Trump-Iran agreement says about Lebanon, Hormuz, and uranium. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/18/what-the-trump-iran-14-point-plan-says-about-lebanon-hormuz-and-uranium
ABC News. (2026, June 24). Trump and Cassidy clash over war powers vote in meeting with Republican senators. https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-cassidy-clash-war-powers-vote-meeting-republican/story?id=134179399
Time. (2026, June 24). Trump says he won’t sign housing bill until Congress passes the SAVE Act. Here’s how it can become law anyway. https://time.com/article/2026/06/24/trump-housing-bill-save-america-act-voting-restrictions/
USAFacts. (2026, June 27). Are wages keeping up with inflation? https://usafacts.org/answers/are-wages-keeping-up-with-inflation/country/united-states/
Vote.org. (2026, March 18). The SAVE Act: What every American voter needs to know. https://www.vote.org/save-act/
Wikipedia. (2026). 2026 Iran war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war
Wikipedia. (2026). Iran nuclear deal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_nuclear_deal
Wikipedia. (2026). Islamabad Memorandum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamabad_Memorandum
Wikipedia. (2026). Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safeguard_American_Voter_Eligibility_Act
WichitaLiberty.org. (2026, June). Kansas SB 105: What the Senate Vacancy Law actually says. https://www.wichitaliberty.org/kansas-government/kansas-sb-105-senate-vacancy-law-analysis/
Wisconsin Watch / Gigafact. (2026, February 19). Do 80% of Americans support voter ID? https://wisconsinwatch.org/2026/02/voter-id-americans-support-wisconsin-poll-photo-identification/