‘Not Evil Just Wrong’ filmmaker tells of harms of radical environmentalists


Update: for my review of the film, click on “Not Evil Just Wrong” a powerful refutation of Al Gore, environmental extremism.

Watching the film she made, I became angry. After talking with her, I feel better, but I’m still angry.

She’s Ann McElhinney. The film she made is Not Evil Just Wrong. It’s a very powerful antidote to former vice president Al Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth and the extremism it has generated.

McElhinney was in Wichita yesterday to speak to a civic group. I attended her talk, and then spoke with her afterwards.

So why am I angry? Over and over, Gore and other radical environmentalists disregard facts and science, while at the same time proclaiming that the scientific debate is over. And it’s not just an academic debate. As Not Evil Just Wrong illustrates, millions of lives are at stake, as well as our standard of living.

An important episode in the film isn’t directly related to the global warming debate, but it serves to illustrate the ways we’ve been wrong before, and it gives us insight into one of the most visible personalities driving global warming extremism.

“Who here has played in the fog behind DDT trucks,” McElhinney asked the audience in Wichita. The widespread use of DDT led to the eradication of malaria in America and large parts of the world. But then a book — Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring — made a connection between DDT and danger to animal and human life. A worldwide ban on DDT followed, and malaria returned, especially to parts of Africa. Millions have died of malaria since then. In Uganda alone, 370 children per day die from malaria. She asked: if this was happening in Kansas, wouldn’t we do anything to stop it?

Everyone believed Carson’s story about DDT. But it was based more on speculation than good science.

In 2006, the World Health Organization said that Carson was wrong. But Gore still defends Carson. He wrote the introduction to an edition of her book. He visited her homestead.

So when Gore says that carbon dioxide is going to ruin the planet, should we pay him much attention? His film An Inconvenient Truth has received a lot of attention, including winning an Oscar. But McElhinney played a clip from Not Evil Just Wrong that showed how the British High Court found that the film contains nine significant exaggerations or scientific errors.

One of these exaggerations is Gore’s claim that sea levels will rise by 20 feet in the near future. The IPCC says this might happen over thousands of years. But schoolchildren in Ireland still get Gore’s erroneous message, and they fear that they will drown.

McElhinney says that “it’s an extraordinary position for Al Gore to take — as a Nobel Laureate, Oscar winner, Emmy winner — to not go back and re-edit the film and take out the errors.”

One of the loudest things we hear from the left, McElhinney says, is that “the discussion is over.” Greens say that global warming is settled scientific fact, humans are at fault, and we have to change the way we live. Her film, she says, shows that this is not conclusive. The scientific method calls for continued checking and debate, and those who call for an end to the debate are anti-scientific.

Energy, especially inexpensive energy, is a wonderful thing, she said. “People in America are very lucky to have the energy that you have. … People get to live long, and get to do really exciting things and make loads of choices, and this doesn’t happen everywhere. … The freedom that people have in America is because of energy. The idea that we would take away energy is, that we would reduce the amount of energy is the most crazy thing I’ve ever heard.” She cautioned us to be careful not to throw away our advantage of inexpensive energy.

Responding to a question from the audience, McElhinney reminded the audience of the existence of radical environmentalists who are opposed to chemicals and pesticides because they want everything to be “natural.” But disease and short life, she said, is the natural state of man.

After her talk, I asked McElhinney about the motivations of people like Al Gore. Does he know the facts, that the famous hockey stick graph is wrong and that the DDT ban has cost millions of lives? Does he know these things and decides to ignore them, or is he just innocently mistaken? She said she thinks that he does know the truth, but he is ideologically driven. Those who are so ideologically blinkered have to stay with their story, even though the facts disagree with them.

Also, Greens (radical environmentalists) think that animals are more important then people. Being elitists, too, the harmful effects of a misplaced war on carbon dioxide won’t affect them on a personal level as it will the masses of people.

I’ve seen Not Evil Just Wrong, and it uses a powerful technique of putting a face, a person, on the issues. McElhinney said that while it’s hard to comprehend of millions of children dying of malaria, “it’s very easy to understand the death of one child.”

Responding to another question, she said that the war against carbon emissions also a war against capitalism, and is also anti-American, with many initiatives directed against America. The wealth generated by capitalism allows people to cultivate gardens, for example, instead of doing whatever is necessary — including damaging the environment — to stay alive.

Coverage from Kansas Watchdog is at “Not Evil, Just Wrong” Counters Environmental Extremism.

Not Evil Just Wrong will be shown in Wichita on Sunday, October 18, as part of its nationwide premier. This free event will be at the CAC Theater at Wichita State University. It starts at 6:00 pm, with meteorologist Mike Smith presenting “An Atmospheric Scientist’s View of Global Warming” at 6:15. The movie will start at 7:00 pm. It runs 85 minutes. I’ll have my review of the movie next week.


7 responses to “‘Not Evil Just Wrong’ filmmaker tells of harms of radical environmentalists”

  1. James

    Any other screenings you know of?

  2. Larry

    Thanks for the update Bob

  3. MJS

    Sounds like an interesting film; but, no, I probably won’t see it: I don’t _need_ to be convinced of just how stupid and fanatical the environmentalists are. I pretty much already know everything they have to say in the film. Hopefully, lots of ordinary folks will see the film and realize just how stupid the environmentalists are; but I doubt it. First of all, the theaters are all in the hands of the very people this film is aimed at, especially the small, independent art houses, which can usually be counted on to run this kind of documentary; and they certainly will not admit heretics into their house. This means that people will have to actively seek the film out. And who’s going to do that? Only the people who already know what’s what. Thus, I seriously doubt the film will have any kind of substantial effect on public opinion. And even if millions of people saw it and were convinced, it wouldn’t stop Congress and the state legislatures from continuing to pass silly “green” laws to strangle our economy and reduce our freedom. It’s been clear for a long time that Congress pays no attention to public opinion. They don’t have to: each member’s re-election is virtually assured unless he gets caught with a mistress or an adolescent male lover.

    And, by the way, mea sententia, the film should be titled “Not Merely Wrong, But Truly Evil.”

  4. bigtroutz

    As a global warming sceptic, I am always pleased to see Gore get hoisted on his own petard. However, using the bullcrap lies associated with Rachel Carson and DDT could not be a worse mistake. Now your argument comes under the category of ‘do 2 wrongs make a right’. The simplest investigation of the facts will reveal this set of fabrications.

    1) Rachel Carson NEVER suggested that DDT be BANNED as a malaria vector control agent. In fact, she specifically recommended that it’s use be curtailed for crops and forest pests not only because of the largely unknown deleterious effects, but also because such misuse made it less effective against such disease vectors.
    2) DDT was NEVER banned in the USA. It’s use is still legal to control insect-disease-vectors to this day.
    3) The total tonnage of global DDT use INCREASED in the decades following its usage-restriction in the USA.
    4) The same assholes pushing the global warming bullcrap (United Nations) decided in their great wisdom to eventually totally ban DDT usage by dictat which nobody paid the slightest attention to. Rachel Carson had little to do with their stupidity. This ban’s only effect was to screw the poorest nations that needed to use UN funds for vector control, and so could not employ DDT. Anybody else with the cash could buy it on the open (grey) market and use it however they wished, more or less.
    5) DDT continues to be manufactured and used to control insects to this day in various parts of the world, however the legacy of its misuse to control crop and forest pests has made it MUCH less effective as an insect disease vector control agent.

  5. Flu-Bird

    A real documentry much better then AL GORES fat ego trip

  6. […] Of Global Warming Hysteria (www.noteviljustwrong.com). For coverage of her talk in Wichita, see ‘Not Evil Just Wrong’ filmmaker tells of harms of radical environmentalists. For my review of Not Evil Just Wrong, see “Not Evil Just Wrong” a powerful refutation […]


    The ban on DDT was based on lies and junk science and from varius eco-freak groups

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.