Wichita city leaders have promoted public investment in downtown Wichita as wise because it will increase the tax base.
In his State of the City Address for 2013, Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer told the audience (based on his prepared remarks):
As you know, revitalizing downtown has been a key part of growing our community in recent years, recognizing that a healthy and thriving downtown improves our ability to attract new business, keep our young people here, and expand our tax base. With $100 million in completed downtown projects in 2012 and another $115 million starting this year, we’ve made extraordinary progress toward having the downtown that Wichitans have dreamed of. … As development continues downtown, we are closer to reaching our goals of increased pride, an increased tax base, and bringing more businesses and jobs to Wichita.
The Wichita Downtown Development Corporation sold the planning process to Wichitans by making the argument that “it will grow existing tax base revenues.”
To evaluate the success of the city’s efforts, we might look at the change in assessed property valuation in downtown Wichita over past years. A way to do that is to look at the valuations for property in the Wichita downtown self-supporting municipal improvement district (SSMID). This is a region of the city that pays an additional property tax to fund the activities of the Wichita Downtown Development Corporation. Its boundaries are roughly the Arkansas River east to Washington, and Kellogg north to Central.
Assessed valuation is the basis for levying property tax. The process starts with an appraised value, which is targeted to be fair market value for the property. Then, that is multiplied by 25 percent for commercial property, or by 11.5 percent for residential property. This produces the assessed value. Multiply that by the sum of the several mill levy rates that apply to the property, and you have the total property tax for that property.
With all the new projects coming online in downtown Wichita, we should expect that the assessed valuation is rising. As someone converts an old, dilapidated property into something more valuable, appraised and assessed values should rise. As new buildings are built, new appraised and assessed value is created where before there was none (or very little). This process is the success story that Mayor Brewer and boosters of public investment in downtown trumpet, as the mayor did twice in one paragraph in his State of the City Address.
So what has happened to the assessed valuation of property in downtown Wichita, using the SSMID as a surrogate?
The answer is that after a period of increasing values, the assessed value of property in downtown has has been declining. The peak was in 2008. The nearby table holds the figures.
This is the opposite of what we’ve been promised. We’ve been told that public investment in downtown Wichita builds up the tax base.
Some might excuse this performance by noting there’s been a recession. That’s true. But according to presentations, there has been much activity in downtown Wichita. Hundreds of millions of dollars in worth, we are told.
So why isn’t the assessed valuation rising? Why is it falling during the time of huge successes?
More research is needed.
Data can be viewed here.
And still Janet Miller doesn’t get it!!! this is her district
I’m sure some liberal or big downtown supporter will have a good answer. If no one leaves an answer in the comments then this will be a first time the liberals don’t have an answer.
I can’t wait to see what they come up with.
It is interesting to note that under the leadership of the previous Mayor, 2003-07 the Municipal District Increased Valuations by almost $7,500 without any new incentives, while during the reign of Mayor Brewer since 2008 the valuation in downtown has decreased $9,900 while giving away millions in financial incentives to his supporters. Was it, Pres. Bush fault or Brewer’s lack of leadership?
Definitely further analysis is needed. Is the SSMID budget a function of the mill levy or is the mill levy set as a function of their budget? Secondly, does the SSMID levy subject to TIF? If yes, that would easily explain this trend as the SSMID levy would only be applied to the “base” and not the increased valuation.