Today’s Wichita Eagle carries two news stories regarding the proposed expansion of a downtown Wichita tax increment financing (TIF) district. The front-page story Condo vote key to downtown Wichita growth and the additional story Owners report mixed views of developers provided background on the vote the Wichita City Council may make at Tuesday’s 9:00 am meeting.
The second article provides insight into Real Development’s track record in Wichita. While success in any real estate venture is not guaranteed, certain types of arrangements seem to have a high likelihood of problems, and these are reported on in the article.
Not mentioned is the problems at the Lofts at St. Francis, a Real Development residential condominium project. Last summer I reported on how this building’s facade needed repair, and the city needed to intervene in order to finance the repairs. I wrote, and testified in front of the city council, that the inability of the homeowners association to deal on its own with such a simple matter indicated a defect somewhere: “While the homeowners association and the condominium owners might not have anticipated that repairs would be needed so soon after the building’s opening, they must have contemplated that repairs and maintenance — to either exterior or interior common areas — would be needed at some time.”
The city waived two guidelines in its facade improvement program so that special assessment financing could be granted to the owners of condominiums in this building.
Some private parties have an interest in seeing Real Development — the “Minnesota Guys” — continue to receive subsidy from the City of Wichita. At Tuesday’s city council meeting, several businessmen testified on behalf of Real Development on the basis that this company is good for the future of downtown Wichita. Some of these, such as a current Key Construction executive, have an obvious financial motive for wanting the project to proceed with city subsidy.
Others, such as a former Key Construction company executive, may also have financial motives that are not immediately obvious. In particular, two tenants of Real Development buildings testified. Joe Tigert, the manager of the New York Life office in Wichita, spoke on behalf of Real Development. He didn’t reveal that he’s a tenant of Real Development at 125 N. Market. Joe Lloyd of Liebherr-Aerospace also spoke in favor of Real Development. His office is at 105 S. Broadway, another Real Development property.
Those who speak at Wichita City Council meetings are not required to disclose their motivations for speaking. And unlike the requirement at the federal and state level, those who are being paid to lobby the council are not required to disclose the fact that they are being paid, or who is paying them, or how much they spend lobbying.
An underlying current of thought that is emerging is that because of its extensive holdings in downtown Wichita, Real Development is too big to fail. If the city doesn’t grant their request for expansion of the amount of the TIF district, the future of downtown Wichita is in doubt.
Citizens ought to reject this argument. If we want to have a robust downtown Wichita, we need development that is grounded in solid free-market fundamentals. Development propped up with subsidy will not have the solid foundation that downtown needs if it is to be successful over the long term.
[…] meeting, Longwell said this in explaining his support of a TIF district created for the benefit of Real Development: “One of the things that people I think need to understand is that this is not a tax […]