For Kansas teachers union, fund balances are an illusion, not a solution


Today’s edition of Under the Dome Today — that’s the house organ of the Kansas National Education Association (or KNEA, the teachers union) — contains a story with the headline “Anti-Government Group launches another attack on public education.”

A more accurate headline might read “School spending advocacy group refuses to acknowledge budget solution that Kansas Deputy Education Commissioner Dale Dennis says could be used.” But that’s a tad wordy.

The headline is over a story reporting on Kansas Policy Institute president Dave Trabert’s testimony to the Kansas House Appropriations Committee. In this testimony, according to the writer for the teachers union, Trabert “gave a presentation attacking the K-12 education system.”

KPI has found that Kansas schools are sitting on fund balances of some $700 million that could be used to make it through a tough budget year. Using these funds could let schools operate without making cuts to their budgets, and without increasing taxes or finding “revenue enhancements.”

School spending advocates dispute this. But Kansas Deputy Education Commissioner Dale Dennis agrees with Trabert that these fund balances could be used — if the schools wanted to.

Schools, however, would rather find additional sources of revenues. Everyone else calls these taxes.

Chief school spending lobbyist Mark Tallman of the Kansas Association of School Boards (KASB) argued, according to the report, “many of the funds Trabert labels reserves are restricted or necessary to cover costs before government payments are received.”

That’s true. But this argument, just like a faulty op-ed written by Kansas school board member David Dennis, says nothing about whether the balances in these funds are too high, too low, or just right.

The evidence we do have — uncovered by KPI — tells us that the balances in these funds are more than needed. That’s because they’ve been growing rapidly, by 53 percent over the last four years. The only way the fund balances can grow is if schools aren’t spending the money as fast as it’s going in the funds.

Mentioning facts like this somehow, according to the Kansas teachers union, constitutes an attack on public schools.

Here’s a question that Kansans should insist that school spending advocates like the Kansas teachers union and the Kansas Association of School Boards answer: Why did all school districts in Kansas except four declined to participate in efficiency audits last year? That’s an attack on the Kansas taxpayer, and also on Kansas schoolchildren who aren’t benefiting from the inefficiencies these audits could reveal.


2 responses to “For Kansas teachers union, fund balances are an illusion, not a solution”

  1. If it didn’t work in Massachusetts it won’t work here. Why do we keep building new schools if we do not have the money to pay for what we have? I, like many, are on fixed income and our mortgages payments go up annually due to property TAX increases. A new state sales tax increase and a federal proposed sales tax are going to kill any economic recovery, therefore, you will lose more state revenue. I see more that the state can CUT. High school athletics could be reduced or increase the adult price of ticket to the games. There are too many school buses and too many over weight, obese children. Suppose there is a link here? I see nothing wrong with kids walking to school or the parents that think it’s cruel to make them walk to school could car pool their children to school. GIVE US A BREAK. Enough is enough, VOTE OUT all incumbents!

  2. Wichitator

    The government school lobby always wants more tax funds. There is never enough money.

    However, all of the massive spending increases for k-12 have resulted in stagnant test scores and more demands for more spending.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.